topcenter

WRESTLING COLUMNS

Pros & Cons Of WWE & NWA-TNA
November 7, 2003 by Chris Chambers


There has been a big deal about people saying WWE is better than NWA - TNA and vice versa. So What I am gonna do is make a Pro & Con List for both WWE & NWA-TNA to settle the argument on which fed is better.

WWE:
Pro: Has great talent such as Chris Benoit, Kurt Angle, RVD, Lance Storm, Chris Jericho, Eddie Guerrero, ect....
Con: To much TV time for the McMahons.

NWA-TNA:
Pro: Great Stars, Good X Division, Good Matches....
Con: Bringing guys back like Lex Luger.

WWE:
Pro: A lot of fan base, great PPV's based on Buy Rates like Wrestlemania....
Con: To much backstage Politics.

NWA-TNA:
Pro: Good Fan Base, Good PPV Buy Rates....
Con: Backstage Politics.

WWE:
Pro: Having pretty good matches on SD (example: Benoit v. Angle) & having a lot of entertainment in the storylines on Raw....
Con: Not pushing Talent that deserves it.

NWA-TNA:
Pro: Pushing all the good talent....
Con: Not having a TV deal yet.


Here is the idea I have about Pros & Cons of WWE & NWA-TNA. This is just my opinions on Pros & Cons. I would love to see everyones version of Pros & Cons of each fed and maybe just maybe we can settle the argument once and for all....on which is the better fed WWE or NWA-TNA.

Send to oww@onlineworldofwrestling.com..

by Chris Chambers..


wrote:

If you have any comments, reactions, rebuttles or thoughts on this column, feel free to send them to the email below,
If your email is intelligently written, they will be posted underneath this messege..
We at OnlineWorldofWrestling want to promote all points of view, and that includes YOURS.



© 2007, Black Pants, Inc. All other trademarks are property of their respective holders.

[ CHAT ROOM | FLASH | SEARCH | FORUMS | DOWNLOADS | TAPES | WRESTLINKS | GUESTBOOK | THANK YOU | CONTACT ]