Tell me something" Can you see HUGE potential in some of the new faces" I sure can. Matt Morgan, MNM, and someone that has showed me he will play a huge part in RAW in about two years: Muhammad Hassan. I would like to point out the pros and cons of these.

MNM:

Pros: Something that is a huge pro is that they have already shown they can be great heels. When I think of them I think "Sh*t I hate those guys, but they are so cool!" which is exactly what I think about Triple H. And the fact that they look absolutely awesome is a good thing too.

Con: Their con is that the WWE has started them off so it makes them look like they can't wrestle. They were so bad in their first match it made Hulk Hogan look like Kurt Angle. (Is that possible")

Matt Morgan:

Pro: Unless you haven't noticed, THIS DUDE IS A TOTAL POWERHOUSE! He is 6'10; I mean, really he is huge. And his finisher is awesome.

Con: His stuttering is sooo stupid, the WWE writers are sooo dumb. His finisher is awesome and very original but can you see him winning any major titles with it""" (Orlando Jordan won a title, which proves with the right storyline you can do anything!). When he was with Nathan Jones I liked him a lot more, they would have been awesome tag team champs, and I would love to see Nathan Jones and Matt Morgan vs. Mark Jindrak and Luther Reigns (if either team were still together).

Muhammad Hassan:

Pro: He opens a doorway for so many grudge match feuds. And I can see him being very successful.

Cons: He has shown less skill every match. The WWE has to keep pushing his gimmick every week so it doesn't become stale.

Chris Masters:

Pro: What pro"

Cons: He is a bad wrestler, his entrance is wasted. I would rather see the money the WWE spends on his fireworks go to charity (wouldn't you") The $1000 Masterlock thing is already boring,(This is mainly because he is ignoring all the viewers at home and is therefore boring the hell out of us!), and what else""" Ummm... there's so much that I can't think of anything else!!!

by Anthony Peric ..