topcenter





WRESTLING COLUMNS

Faith in Mediocrity
August 4, 2006 by Brian Bertrand


I must say it's great to be back. I have my own personal computer now and I can do what I feel like doing and I feel like doing a column again. The writer's block gone, the program successfully hacked, and I'm ready. Let me get one thing straight for those of you who don't know what this column is going to be about. No, it's not a prediction; it's a foresight, meaning that this is how I see the subject progressing.. If you don't like it, then go to that bottom email address and send a response or post it on the appropriate forum because I don't think Brad would want to deal with the type of hate-mail I got from my Yard Tard repost.

When you think of ECW today, you think of a WWE interpretation of ECW. It's not really a surprise because of the fact that Vince McMahon's sphere of influence has definitely brought ECW into a new and awkward light from their new format. Granted they don't have quite the right amount of talent but even so they only gave the ECW show one hour, which is enough to fill the void of talent and at the same time, give what the REAL fans want. Now in Vince's eyes that's not what the fans want because his fans are WWE fans and not ECW fans. They don't know what ECW was as a whole and certainly not just from what WWE has shown on TV.

Given the fact that the old ECW is dead and the new ECW is what is being brought to you, they have a weird way of showing ways of getting involved. The chants are edited out at times or drowned out just as WCW did in the late-'90s, there's barely any feed back from talent other than what's on ECW.com, and there's a bunch of Sci-fi Channel fans that would rather not see ECW on their channel just because of the fact that there's no aliens or space creatures on it. Yes, that is what the sci-fi fans are expecting from ECW...actual stereotypical science fiction elements! Now I know there's going to be a ton of hate mail from this but I can't help but to speak the truth because there's no point in lying anymore. For God's sake people, watch your shows if you want and turn off the TV when our show comes on because believe it or not, ECW is making your channel and network money even for a one-hour timeslot.

With all that being said, I still have my problems with ECW as well as every other column writer on OWW. The major thing that's getting me is the fact that none of the matches are, but the main event, actual ECW matches. They're regular wrestling matches. Come on, when TNN had it on their program, sure they did redneck-ize it, but at least they kept it hardcore and fun to watch the product with no DQ type matches (Tommy Dreamer and Raven vs. The Impact Players - ECW on TNN for reference). Now, those matches are known as "extreme rules" where you can't have it all the time because the new owner is afraid that it will kill the product and give his empire a bad stain on their pants so he'll put some goofy gimmick tag on it to differentiate it.

What is going on with the product that's helping them gain ratings on a network that normally stays away from anything sports-related? Name power! That's all it is, the name ECW is mainly the only thing keeping it going because in my opinion the matches haven't been. With that being said, there is a chance for them yet. With the ratings getting a constant 2.4 on a 4 share, there have been talks or ECW staying on TV longer on Sci-Fi despite what the nerds cry about. There's also been talk of ECW going completely separate from Smackdown tapings, which will open up the floodgates for the true ECW feel.

For those who have been watching ECW for years and think that ECW has sold out to WWE and become a piece of trash product that's just being shoved down our throats, you're right! It has been shoved down our throats but the point is we wanted it there. We're the ones who, for five years, have been thinking of what it would be like if either ECW or WCW would still be around and how it would evolve with the new wave of talent that are sweeping by. Now, it's been brought back for just that reason. You got CM Punk and Shannon Moore, two outstanding talents from ROH and TNA and yet people don't realize how big assets these guys really are. In fact, the WWE marks have probably forgotten that "The Reject" is also the #1 MF'er with Matt Hardy back in 2003. Who knew he'd be keeping his "Prince of Punk" gimmick now?

The ECW fans are the ones that are keeping the new ECW alive because they heard that ECW may be breaking off of the Smackdown coat tails and go on the road on their own. WWE bashes them for checking the news and for having a higher interest than many fans but those same people are what WWE rely on for their new product because they have heard of CM Punk, Mike Knox, and remember Test as they know what they can do in the ring and expect to see of them in the ring. That's why Vince McMahon put some of his money into the old product. With the new look he can see exactly how we feel and how far we are willing to watch it. With this current direction the true ECW fans -- the fans that go to the websites, show interest in TNA and the independent companies, and the ones that express their opinion in chat rooms and message boards and write columns about it here on OWW and other sites, -- have a new ECW and will have to be patient if they want some of that WWE smell to wear off and for Paul Heyman to change his gimmick.

So what should WWE do to give a more entertaining show after ECW breaks from Smackdown? Can the ECW and new fans from WWE wait that long? Will they get the old ECW Arena back? Ow, the questions hurt. Let's first talk about how WWE should improve it without having to go over the top. My main concern that's starting to drive me away from ECW is the main event. I mentioned this before; the fans don't want to see Big Show defending the ECW World Heavyweight Title against other WWE people. It's an ECW title for god sakes. Smackdown defends their titles against Smackdown people and Raw defends against Raw people. So why isn't ECW defending against ECW people? Their roster looks full enough to do that and yet they haven't done that at all ever since Big Show became champion. The ECW faithful are very patient and have shown that in the past with the first One Night Stand because that was the highest rated PPV event of 2005. The second ONS wasn't as high this year but it still sold out the Hammerstein Ballroom. The smaller venues are more for the open-minded fans anyways; APW sells out high schools and, most recently, the Kezar Center in San Francisco so ECW could easily go back to the New Alhambra and reclaim it as the ECW Arena. But all this is long-term and the short-term look is just getting started for the new brand and this will be a big test not only for Vince McMahon, but for WWE as a whole.

On the hateful side of the product, some of the guys on TNA helped make ECW a landmark for wrestling fans. I have nothing but respect for those guys and I hope they have some faith as much as a lot of the hardcore ECW fans. Hail Rhino for his statements on TNA Impact! Hail Team 3D for giving the fans an ECW-style match in the ECW Arena complete with raining chairs! Hail Brother Runt for tearing up that ECW contract! To them, ECW has shown to the fans that until they get a better deal; until Vince McMahon sees more zeros on that check from NBC, Extreme Championship Wrestling will be nothing more than another XFL. This test will either prove or deny just that.

by Brian Bertrand..


Chuck Pane wrote:
First off, no disrespect intended, but whatever you say about ECW or WWE as a whole about how I would change it won't do a damn thing to change the direction of the show because your name isnt Vincent Kennedy McMahon Jr. or any other storyline writers in the WWE today. You have absolutely no power over the direction of the WWE. Now, your ideas are great, but obvious. ECW needs to branch off on its own, while occasionaly fighting other brands (yes its a brand, not a separate company like it used to be. the "B" brand in my opinion). I think the ECW brand should only go to places they used to go to like the Hammerstein Ballroom, and other ECW arenas around the globe they used to telecast from, and live event in other places because I think the venue makes the event. I personally thought ECW had a great feel when they went to the Hammerstein Ballroom for the most recent ECW telecasted event on Sci-Fi with the eception of Test, Mike Knoxx, Big Show and Batista being there because to me they dont represent ECW but WWE to me. However I loved seeing CM Punk there who has a bright future there, but really is disappionting to not being able to see the Pepsi Plunge ever in ECW until Vince stops getting overprotective of his talent. Well im rambleing now and ill stop here saying that was a well written but obvious article. (no disrespect intended here either).
John Nelson wrote:
ECW is back and there are some kinks to iron out. Some of them thankfully are.

1. Is Sandman, for the time being anyway the gimmick of him swatting away goobers in the ring is done and he's back to matches where he belongs. Lets hope it stays this way.

2. Kelly's Expose' We don't need Tn'A that's what RAW is for with Torrie and Candice. Hopefully with this Knox guy around, she'll stay off the stage and be at ringside. Even better is if Kelly and Knox left for Smackdown.

3. Actual you know WRESTLING!! With Angle back, CM Punk on who had a nuclear level debut (I never saw him before so it could have been a BAD match and I still thought he was great!) and RVD hopefully back soon we can get away from big fatties who just swing away and have the same big boot, stomping and powerslam. Thats what RAW is for, again.

4. Though I'm not a big fan of it, the occult and vampire touches to the show are different. Paul Heyman if I'm not mistaken said somewhere that it's not just to appeal to Sci Fi viewers, it's cause kids are into goth and vampires and it's a way to help market the product to a target audience. More creative selling tool then sex I suppose. Again RAW.

Other things however still need to be addressed.

Time, it's only an hour. While it is enough to squeeze in three matches, many of the matches so far are squashes and the squashees are great guys like Al Snow and Little Guido. Put them on so they can impress us with some cool moves, don't bury them.

Big Show with the belt. Hey, I'm a Big Show fan and I love the guy, but having the ECW belt and putting him over RVD may not have been the greatest idea. Seeing Show covered in soda and cups which hasn't been seen since the days of George "The Animal" Steele says something. Big Show needs to hit his real wrestling skills which we all know he has not this slappy choppy stuff since it gets old. His Cobra Clutch backbreaker is a nice new move for him though.

Quit cross promoting. The older talent may get more screen time if some star from RAW or Smackdown! stays off the card. I can see it as a way of helping strech interest but it's time to stop.

ECW is on the rise, but it's not there yet. Maybe a Pay Per View, another hour of programming and another couple of belts like the old TV Belt would be nice. Get some more great wrestlers on, use more of the talent you have instead of just at house shows and I think ECW has a chance. I'm telling you though after a foul opening show and a few clunkers in between, I did have my doubts and sadly still do.

Thank you. Hope to see it posted soon.
Wattsrvn wrote:
Finally someone says what we are all thinking! I totally agree with what you've said in this column. ECW is dead, and the new ECW cannot cut it because half of ECW's original stars aren't there! Shane Douglas, Raven, Rhino, The Dudley Boyz (screw that Team 3-D bullsh*t they're the freakin' Dudleyz!) Lance Storm, the list goes on and on. Yes, CM Punk has been embraced by the masses (because the New York fans remember his ROH matches that took place in Manhattan), but with these ridiculous "inter-promotional title matches" it cannot live up to the hype for long because real ECW fans hate the product. Book Big Show v Sabu and have the Homicidal, Suicidal, Genocidal, Death-Defying Maniac win the damn belt! That would make the true ECW faithful happy.
Brian Bertrand wrote:
I'm not saying I have any influence on how the WWE wants to run their products. Remember, it's a forsight, not a prediction nor a proclaimation. My views are obvious but it's something that all the fans that have seen ECW, One Night Stand, and Hardcore Homecoming only to see what was a good idea turn a little sour because of what Vince McMahon wants to do according to his vision of ECW. He has every right to do that, he's the freakin' owner! What is happening is that these writers that are from Smackdown and (unfortunately for us wrestling fans) Nickelodeon, out of all places, only have seen the ECW DVDs and whatever was on One Night Stand. The higher ups in WWE don't want their writers to look at something that's presented to them within a certain basis.

Talent wise, TNA does have a good amount of ECW guys but even with their current roster the "ECW Originals" that they have have all gotten older and can't work on a full-time schedule as much as WWE is doing, which is why guys like C.W. Anderson aren't working matches on Sci-Fi. If anything the WWE can sure use a lot of help when it comes to ECW. That's a given. That's why this is more of a test run for Vince.
james sands wrote:
Alright this is my first comment on oww.com so here goes In my opinion ECW is very weak at the moment and it needs a revamping of sorts to the older style of hardcore which it pioneered here is what they need to do

1. Give Sabu the title at Summerslam if the match between him and Big Show happens there which i think it will

2. Jimmy Yang to ECW to have great matches with Little Guido, Tony Mamaluke, Mexicools which they should bring over and others which will be solid contests like that of the International 3-way dances between Guido, Taijiri and Super Crazy also add Billy Kidman who should be signedand CM Punk maybe Shannon Moore and develop a great Lightweight division whic brings me to my next point

3. TV and Tag titles should return with the likes of the wrestlers above battling it out for TV Title supremacy

4. After Sabu has the title let him feud with veterans such as Dreamer, Sandman, Credible, Funk and RVD when he returns, also have them occasionaly battle Angle and Show but not have the former WWE superstars dominate like Angle over Credible in seconds that was insulting to ECWs legacy

5. Paul Heyman turns back face saying RVD took drugs and betrayed Eddies memory which started the drug policy up again and throws his security out of there gimmicks and into the Tag Division as the Bashams who they are underneath there security gear

6. All matches should be ECW rules without them it is not ECW

7. Establish the title with for example Stairway to Hell, Singapore Cane, Ladder and even Barb Wire matches between the ECW veterans, I know this takes tremendous toll on there bodies but it would help greatly

8. Bringing WWE superstars such as Angle and Show who were never in ECW in the first place was a mistakeand its worsening with bringing in E superstars to challenge for the title

9. Feud possibilities: Example: Angle vs Sandman, say that the crucifixtion was Sandmans booking idea in the first place, Crucify the wrestling machine which probably wouldnt be allowed by vince because of the uproar it would cause around the world but Sandman and "Insert Veteran Here" say he didnt build ECW and doesnt deserve to walk around like he owns it so as i said befor Crucify him and send him into Wrestling Overdrive

I will write a column probably on feud possibilities in the coming month so look out for it ---- all in all LET ECW BE ECW
edward ciotoli wrote:
I do think that the new ECW has more 'McMahon' than 'Heyman' fell to it. Take notice that this ECW focuses more on guys like Knox and Test rather than ECW stalwarts like Dreamer and Balls Mahoney. Has anyone noticed that Dreamer has yet to win a match in the new ECW? Think about: The Sandman and Dreamer lost at ONS 2005 to the Dudleys. Then, at ONS 2006, Beulah, Funk, and Dreamer lost to Lita, Foley, and Edge. EDGE. In the older days of ECW, Dreamer would've wrecked a guy like Edge. Also, on ECW on SciFi, Dreamer has been reduced to jobbing to guys like Bigshow, and Mr. No Chrisma himself, Test. Speaking of jobbing, why would people like Justin Credible and Al Snow be reduced to jobbing? Credible was former a ECW champion and ECW Tag Team champion with Lance Storm as the monster Impact Players. Al Snow was a great technical wrestler and a major threat to Shane Douglas' ECW title. It's sad really. If ECW wants to appeal to new and old fans, I have a few suggestions:

1. Bring back some older guys. I know, thats beating a dead horse, but try to bring back some older faces. Simond Dean is going no where fast. Solution: Bring Dean to ECW and become Nova again. The Blue Meanie is doing nothing right now. Possibly, there could be a bWo reunion if Nova and Meanie could come to ECW (Richards is already there.) 'Primetime' Brian Lee is looking for work, bring him back to ECW. New Jack is always a good canidate for coming to ECW. If they signed New Jack, they could get Da Baldies to come back as well. DeVito has already been on ECW twice now. Just get Grimes and Angel. How about Kid Kash? The Pitbulls gimmick is getting stale and Kash does have roots in the company. What about CW? He's signed, but we have not seen him on TV.

2. Bring back the Tag Team and TV titles. Hold tournaments. It would be better to see more titles defened.

3. Start doing more shoot promos! TNA always rags on ECW. Rag on TNA. At least ECW doesn't need old has beens like Sting or Steiner to get ratings. Plus, the people who 'loved' ECW are now saying they hate it? (Team 3D and Rhino come to mind.)

4. Don't focus on outside talent! We see WWE superstars all the time! You don't need WWE stars to get ratings! Show more ECW talent (and I'm talking about Kell, Test, or Knox either.) Let Dreamer win a match too and forget about Kevin Thorn and Shelly! Occult isn't ECW!

Thanks for your time. I hope this will get posted onto the column.
Crook wrote:
First off, my last column, "Open Letter to the haters of the 'New' ECW" was almost a direct response to this column. But now after reading some of the responses to the article, I feel compelled to respond myself.

First off, Chuck Payne, and John Nelson, whoever the hell you are, you nailed it on the head. ECW most definately SHOULD be about the WRESTLING, not the "Exteme" that the new ECW fanbase buys into. See my column (shill, shill!). And they SHOULD stick to those East Coast arenas, like the Hammerstein Ballroom, and whatever bingo hall that is they hit in Trenton, NJ, and the "real" ECW Arena in Philly.

Face facts, it's VincECW, so we have to deal with some things we don't like, but once they get re-upped, and prove to Vince they can make money, I think things can get better, or maybe I'm just an EXTREME optimist.

And real quick, to whoever said it: They had to get the title off of RVD, because he HAD to be suspended. Big Show was as good a choice as anyone. What, do you want to see Sabu vs RVD for 7 minutes? Hell NO! You want to see them for 25 minutes, on PPV, in Stretcher Match 2! Put it on Big Show, let the old ECW guys chase him to take it for "ECW pride".

One last point: Wattsrvn, do you really WANT to see Raven, Shane Douglas, and the Dudleyz in ECW? They are mere shells of their former selves, and would NOT be up to the standards of Sabu, AngleSandman, Dreamer, hell, even Big Show, Justin Credible, Little Guido, David Thorn or whatever Vampire Mordecai calls himself, Test or even Mike FREAKIN' Knox! Raven, Douglas, Dudleys, see ya. Lance Storm? Yeah, it would be great to see an Impact Players reunion, but with only one hour of TV time, no tag division outside of the FBI, and Storm himself pretty pissed with the "new" ECW, what's the point? Go with what you got, get the ratings, get a new TV deal in September, and bring back the TV Title. It'll be fine.
Steve O wrote:
i got an idea that will sort all this out. split the three companies into three brands. vince mcmahon has total control over raw(wwf), bischoff over smackdown(wcw), and heyman over ecw. each company stays out of the others buisness. different contracts (for instance if you sign with wcw you are not part of the wwe and would not be able to join another roster until your contract runs out or you get fired,and for christs sake nullify that stupid no compete clause), different writers, different pay per views. vince pays for the whole thing so ecw and wcw wont fold this time. better yet put them all in the same timeslot. thats great
Andrew irving wrote:
First of all, I'd like to concur with whoever mentioned Kurt Angle beating Justin Credible in about 10 seconds as insulting to the ECW legacy. I think a part of me dies inside every time I watch someone (even CM Punk) get a quick victor over Justin. This seems to be a growing trend in WWE's ECW as well since, in a one hour show, you could have 3 good matches or 4 quick matches and WWE chooses quantity over quality it seems (although I must admit that I didn't mind when Taz picked up a quick win over Lawler at the PPV, but even then I was disappointed because I had been looking forward to seeing Taz in the ring again).

With CM Punk's instant and ever-growing popularity with the 'true' ECW fans (up in the north east), WWE has decided he doesn't need any classic matches to put him over (and horrifyingly, this means his most recent matches have all lasted no more than 3 or so minutes). Even worse, at the time of writing (11 October 2006), every WWE show allows 5-10 minutes to advertise John Cena's upcoming movie (this isn't going to turn into a Cena rant, promise!) so there's even less time for wrestling and this was the whole basis for ECW in the first place.

In my opinion, the use of weapons in the original ECW was no more than a gimmick, although admitadely, some guys utilised this for their moves (RVD's Van-Daminator, Sandman's White Russian Leg Sweep - which incedently he doesn't seem to use anymore). I used to like Jerry Lawler until he created this impression on RAW commentery that ECW was just a more violent version of WWE's now defunct hardcore division, which is verging on slanderous.

I don't really have a great problem with WWE guys coming across AS LONG AS THEY CAN WRESTLE. I always measure wrestling ability on reversals personally, which is why I am pretty much in awe of Bryan Danielson. Guys like Test kind of annoy me, I'm not so into the 'power' wrestlers (and nor was ECW!) and how come his neckbreaker, which rarely got him the pin in WWF/E, is now his finisher? That used to be a mid-match move for a lot of guys in ECW! On the other hand (and trust me, I'm preparing myself for the inevitable, possibly violent, response to this) I saw Matt Striker (yes I said Matt Striker) in a tag match with Big Show the other week and he seemed to know his way around the ring, so that's cool.

All of that was kind of a bunch of stuff which came to my head as a result of reading everyone else's stuff, all I really wanted to do was ask everyone who wrote in; why do you watch WWE:ECW? If it hurts as much as it obviously does, then why do it? Me personally, I couldn't bare it except that I love guys like Tommy Dreamer, Justin Credible, RVD, Sabu, Balls Mahoney, CW Anderson (another victom of the quick loss syndrome the other week, sigh), heck even Danny Doring and I don't mind watching them lose, just so long as I can see them.

P.S. I'm not so sure about bringing the TV Title back, WWE has a ridiculous number of titles, which I would like to see reduced if anything. It would be cool though to see an 'ECW original' win it and overshadow the Big Show, who seems like a genuinely good guy, but one who has listened too closely to Jerry Lawler and thinks that the best way to get respect from ECW fans is to put someone (or be put) through a table.
Andrew Irving wrote:
First of all, I'd like to concur with whoever mentioned Kurt Angle beating Justin Credible in about 10 seconds as insulting to the ECW legacy. I think a part of me dies inside every time I watch someone (even CM Punk) get a quick victor over Justin. This seems to be a growing trend in WWE's ECW as well since, in a one hour show, you could have 3 good matches or 4 quick matches and WWE chooses quantity over quality it seems (although I must admit that I didn't mind when Taz picked up a quick win over Lawler at the PPV, but even then I was disappointed because I had been looking forward to seeing Taz in the ring again).

With CM Punk's instant and ever-growing popularity with the 'true' ECW fans (up in the north east), WWE has decided he doesn't need any classic matches to put him over (and horrifyingly, this means his most recent matches have all lasted no more than 3 or so minutes). Even worse, at the time of writing (11 October 2006), every WWE show allows 5-10 minutes to advertise John Cena's upcoming movie (this isn't going to turn into a Cena rant, promise!) so there's even less time for wrestling and this was the whole basis for ECW in the first place.

In my opinion, the use of weapons in the original ECW was no more than a gimmick, although admitadely, some guys utilised this for their moves (RVD's Van-Daminator, Sandman's White Russian Leg Sweep - which incedently he doesn't seem to use anymore). I used to like Jerry Lawler until he created this impression on RAW commentery that ECW was just a more violent version of WWE's now defunct hardcore division, which is verging on slanderous.

I don't really have a great problem with WWE guys coming across AS LONG AS THEY CAN WRESTLE. I always measure wrestling ability on reversals personally, which is why I am pretty much in awe of Bryan Danielson. Guys like Test kind of annoy me, I'm not so into the 'power' wrestlers (and nor was ECW!) and how come his neckbreaker, which rarely got him the pin in WWF/E, is now his finisher? That used to be a mid-match move for a lot of guys in ECW! On the other hand (and trust me, I'm preparing myself for the inevitable, possibly violent, response to this) I saw Matt Striker (yes I said Matt Striker) in a tag match with Big Show the other week and he seemed to know his way around the ring, so that's cool.

All of that was kind of a bunch of stuff which came to my head as a result of reading everyone else's stuff, all I really wanted to do was ask everyone who wrote in; why do you watch WWE:ECW? If it hurts as much as it obviously does, then why do it? Me personally, I couldn't bare it except that I love guys like Tommy Dreamer, Justin Credible, RVD, Sabu, Balls Mahoney, CW Anderson (another victom of the quick loss syndrome the other week, sigh), heck even Danny Doring and I don't mind watching them lose, just so long as I can see them.

P.S. I'm not so sure about bringing the TV Title back, WWE has a ridiculous number of titles, which I would like to see reduced if anything. It would be cool though to see an 'ECW original' win it and overshadow the Big Show, who seems like a genuinely good guy, but one who has listened too closely to Jerry Lawler and thinks that the best way to get respect from ECW fans is to put someone (or be put) through a table.
wrote:

wrote:

If you have any comments, reactions, rebuttles or thoughts on this column, feel free to send them to the email below,
If your email is intelligently written, they will be posted underneath this messege..
We at OnlineWorldofWrestling want to promote all points of view, and that includes YOURS.



© 2015, Black Pants, Inc. All other trademarks are property of their respective holders.

[ CHAT ROOM | FLASH | SEARCH | FORUMS | DOWNLOADS | TAPES | WRESTLINKS | GUESTBOOK | THANK YOU | CONTACT ]